Harald Welte's blog
   

RSS

Harald's Web
gnumonks.org
hmw-consulting.de
sysmocom.de

Projects
OpenBSC
OsmocomBB
OsmocomTETRA
deDECTed.org
gpl-violations.org
gpl-devices.org
OpenMoko
gnufiish
OpenEZX
OpenBeacon
OpenPCD
librfid
openmrtd
opentom.org
netfilter/iptables

Categories

Archives

Other Bloggers
David Burgess
Zecke
Dieter Spaar
Michael Lauer
Stefan Schmidt
Rusty Russell
David Miller
Martin Pool
Jeremy Kerr
Tim Pritlove (German)
fukami (German)
fefe (German)
Bradley M. Kuhn
Lawrence Lessig
Kalyan Varma

Aggregators
kernelplanet.org
planet.netfilter.org
planet.openezx.org
planet.openmoko.org
planet.foss.in

Ohloh profile for laforge
identi.ca
twitter
flattr
Linked in
Xing

Creative Commons License
Articles on this blog/journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.


blosxom


Contact/Impressum

       
Thu, 07 Apr 2005
More dual Opteron netfilter/iptables benchmarks

The last two days I was at a network performance lab in Stralsund, Germany. We were testing dual Opteron 250 (2,4GHz) machines with e1000 cards and Linux.

One of the interesting results was that ip_conntrack [again] scales better as the load generators. The generators couldn't establish more than 25,000 new TCP connections per second and no more than 1 million total concurrent connections ;)

Thus I'm now pretty much convinced that ip_conntrack scales quite reasonable, and we should concentrate optimizations to other areas of netfilter/iptables.

[ /linux/netfilter | permanent link ]

Windows USERS have less security holes than Linux USERS

I don't usually join the never-ending discussion on proprietary vs. free software, since I know what I think is best for me anyway.

But there is one quote that I'd like to add to this blog, because it's [unwillingly] funny:

That is the literal translation of one of the headlines on the German Microsoft homepage ("Windows-Benutzer haben weniger Sicherheits-Schwachstellen als Linux-Benutzer").

[ /linux | permanent link ]