Harald Welte's blog
   

RSS

Harald's Web
gnumonks.org
hmw-consulting.de
sysmocom.de

Projects
OpenBSC
OsmocomBB
OsmocomTETRA
deDECTed.org
gpl-violations.org
gpl-devices.org
OpenMoko
gnufiish
OpenEZX
OpenBeacon
OpenPCD
librfid
openmrtd
opentom.org
netfilter/iptables

Categories

Archives

Other Bloggers
David Burgess
Zecke
Dieter Spaar
Michael Lauer
Stefan Schmidt
Rusty Russell
David Miller
Martin Pool
Jeremy Kerr
Tim Pritlove (German)
fukami (German)
fefe (German)
Bradley M. Kuhn
Lawrence Lessig
Kalyan Varma

Aggregators
kernelplanet.org
planet.netfilter.org
planet.openezx.org
planet.openmoko.org
planet.foss.in

Ohloh profile for laforge
identi.ca
twitter
flattr
Linked in
Xing

Creative Commons License
Articles on this blog/journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.


blosxom


Contact/Impressum

       
Tue, 01 Nov 2005
Bug reports after 2.6.14 is out.

I've already received three different serious bug reports about problems with netfilter/iptables in 2.6.14. This is frustrating, considering how long the 2.6.14 development cycle was. People should try new features of a new kernel _before_ there is a release. Afterwards it's too late.

[ /linux/netfilter | permanent link ]

Basic Access Control

It seems like even though the specification looks quite verbose upon first sight, there are many tiny pitfalls in implementing basic access control according to the TR-PKI 1.1 specification.

Padding is such an issue. You always pad for DES en/decryption, _but not_ if you are in the mutual authenticate command ;)

I now have the key derivation, authentication and setup of session keys working. Secure Messaging still has some problems with regard to the DES retail MAC. Let's hope I get this finished soon.

[ /linux/mrtd | permanent link ]

Insurance against GPL violations

According to this zdnet.com article, there is now an insurance against legal risks from violating Free Software Licenses.

Strangely, that article claims the insurance is about "the risk of using open source software". This is misleading, since there is no risk involved in _using_ the software. There is, like with any other software, a risk when you violate the license.

One wonders when we'll get such an insurance for "the risks of using proprietary software [without obtaining a license]".

[ /linux/gpl-violations | permanent link ]