After finishing most of the basic device support for GTA02v2 in both kernel and u-boot during the last week, I've finally turned back to implementing one of the longest standing issues in u-boot: GSM passthrough.
GSM passthrough allows you to basically ignore the smartphone part of the device and connect the GSM modem more or less directly to a host PC. The feature has been long known by various smartphone hacker projects such as e.g. OpenEZX (which as a side note has made quite some progress recently, much appreciated by me as retired project founder).
So GSM passthrough is mainly useful for rapid development (developing gsmd more efficiently by running it on the developers workstation, without cross-compiling and ipkg installs), but also if you want to use some legacy application that was written at a time where a phone really only was a phone (e.g. sim card managers, ...)
Now the GSM passthrough was always pushed back on the TODO list, since our usbtty code in u-boot was never very reliable and caused lots of data corruption such as bogus and/or missing characters. Quite useful for the human operator, but definitely not acceptable for getting a program with AT command parser to work. So that had to be fixed first (and it is now fixed).
As I pointed out in my announcement, the generic way of implementing this feature has actually quite interesting but much more obscure use cases such as dialling from a landline via GSM (CSD call) into your Neo, manually accepting the incoming call and then attaching the u-boot command line to it. That's sort of the feature you have on hosted/colocated servers, when you use a boot-loader with serial console support and attach a modem or terminal server to it.
So does this mean the Neo1973 is now ready for the enterprise? Not quite. Even though it has a built-in UPS (called battery), and GTA02 will even allow you to change the battery without shutting down the device, resulting in higher availability ;)
But then, the expectations / requirements for mobile communications devices are quite a bit different from that world. But the hackers community likes those kind of strange features. Have you ever heard of another smartphone with that capability?
Oh, and before I get any complaints about the security: This "feature" has to be explicitly enabled and every call manually accepted by typing a sequence of commands into the u-boot command line. So unless the attack involves tons of social engineering (getting the device owner to do all those things) there's not that much of a big deal. But maybe we should start to think of some kind of user authentication for u-boot now *rotfl*.